Results of City Council Meeting
I’m not going to say the staff and consultants behind the Haha plan are a shifty lot. But their presentation to city council was one long rebuttal before any arguments had been made. Defensive, rambling, non-professional. I can’t help but think by stretching their presentation out to OVER AN HOUR, they hoped people would leave or they’d befuddle the council.
And is there really anyone in the world who can’t work powerpoint? If you’re going to use that old chestnut, at least know how to turn the darned pages.
But council asked cogent questions, and obviously already knew about the public concerns. And while the overall design plan was accepted, very important additional work will be done and language added. I can’t say all the trees will be saved, but they will be the subject of a new environmental impact review, taking into account habitat displacement from fire, etc. – something the staff had not wanted at all.
Democracy makes for some tedious meetings, but seems to work at this level. At least in Pasadena.
(For a much more complete look at environmental and open space issues around our way, visit Greenward Civitas. A smart and thoughtful site.)
Original Post
“Counterintuitive.” It’s the polite way of saying fuck!
You’d think with most of Angeles Forest burned and destroyed, the last thing on the City of Pasadena agenda would be to cut down trees in Hahamonga Park. Healthy trees that apparently have the original sin of not being original to the area, or more importantly, stand in the way of two bikes riding abreast. Live trees that are home to hawks and sparrows and all that draw us back to the charred hills. It just counterintuitiveling blows my mind.
These trees are the good guys. The peppers and palms have been a refuge for hikers and riders. They don’t encroach. They don’t throw wild parties and sow seeds throughout the Arroyo. At their worst, these trees give us shade and beauty in the dead heat of summer, and wet their whistle only when the rain falls. No one has the right to counterintuitive with them.
I hope I’m wrong. I hope I misread the city’s plan for Hahamonga – that it doesn’t plan to destroy wildlife habitats in service of native plants. Sacrifice nature to make a nature center.
I hope others who love this little patch of green and wild land will watch what happens at the planning meeting tomorrow. I’m speaking just for myself here, and my interpretation may be way, way off.
Nothing could make me happier than to return from the meeting tomorrow and admit I misread the whole thing; that I got it all counterintuitiveling wrong.
NOTE:
The Pasadena City Council will be considering the Hahamongna Annex Plan on Monday, February 1, 2010 at 7:30 pm in the City Council Chambers in City Hall, 100 N. Garfield St.
Pasadena Daily Photo (who writes on the subject today), Bellis, and I will be there, and surely many many more. Will let you know how it goes.







